Lab Results & Shilajit Comparison Guide
Shilajit Lab Results & Brand Comparison Guide
What the available reports show, what they do not show, and how to compare evidence carefully
For the first-party evidence hub, see our Shilajit Lab Testing page. It is the central place to review the available report images, codes and supporting notes.
What does this page compare?
It compares three different kinds of information: the general specification printed or described for a product, the results recorded on a named report for a submitted sample, and the information publicly disclosed by other brands. These categories should not be treated as interchangeable.
- General label specification: 75–80% fulvic acid for the Gold+ range.
- Measured submitted-sample result: a value recorded on the relevant report for the sample provided.
- Seller-disclosed information: a brand’s own label or product-listing statement, which is not the same as a third-party report.
What do the available Shilajit reports record?
| Product sample | Fulvic acid result | Report code | Other reported analytes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shilajit Gold+ Capsules | 79.22 g/100 g | AR-258-2025-20051564-01 | Arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury |
| Shilajit Gold+ Resin | 76.74 g/100 g | AR-258-2025-20051565-01 | Arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury |
The report codes can be checked against the Eurofins verification portal, subject to access. The report results apply to the samples submitted for analysis. The reports state that Eurofins did not sample the products.
What do the heavy-metal results mean?
The submitted Capsules report records arsenic 0.94 mg/kg, cadmium 0.02 mg/kg, lead 0.63 mg/kg and mercury <0.01 mg/kg. The submitted Resin report records arsenic 0.64 mg/kg, cadmium 0.02 mg/kg, lead 0.66 mg/kg and mercury <0.01 mg/kg.
Those are reported measurements for the submitted samples. The available reports do not state regulatory limits or pass/fail conclusions, so this page does not turn them into a safety, purity or compliance verdict. No microbial-testing section or microbial result appears on the available reports.
How should you compare another Shilajit product?
Look for a complete ingredient declaration, a clear serving instruction, a named laboratory, the actual report code, the sample or batch description, and a clear explanation of what was tested. Treat a marketing percentage as seller-disclosed unless a report supports the specific figure. If a report cannot be checked or its scope is unclear, record that uncertainty rather than filling the gap with an assumption.
- Is the format clear, such as capsules or resin?
- Are the ingredients and serving size stated plainly?
- Is the fulvic acid figure a general specification or a measured submitted-sample result?
- Does the report identify the analytes, method, sample description and report code?
- Does the seller explain the limits of the evidence?
Which 5 Rivers products relate to these reports?
See the Shilajit Gold+ Capsules for the capsule format and the Shilajit Gold+ Resin for the resin format. The Capsules and Resin Bundle combines both formats. Product directions and individual suitability take priority over this comparison guide.
Sources and review note
Source notes: the published product labels, the available reports identified by the codes above, and the Eurofins verification portal. The figures on this page describe submitted samples and should not be read as every-batch testing. Last reviewed: 3 September 2026.
Lab Testing hub | How to choose Shilajit in the UK | Choose Capsules, Resin or Bundle